

|
DAVID IONOVICH BRONSTEIN was born in Bila Tserkva, Soviet Ukraine, on the 19th February 1924; three times married (one son by his first wife, Olga Ignatieva), he died in Minsk (Belarus), apparently of a stroke, on the 5th December 2006. Located 75 km south of Kiev on the road to Odessa, Bila Tserkva is a municipality of about 200,000 people, an ancient civilized culture notable for the chess players it produced or nurtured, which calls itself the "City of Kindness." – [after “Sarah’s Pages”]
The USSR championship qualifier in Rostov-on-Don in the summer of 1941 had to be interrupted when the Germans invaded. The new Master of Sport, Bronstein, fled Kiev on foot leaving everything behind (including many of his precious game records). Conscripted into the Red Army, he avoided being sent into action because of his poor eyesight and during the conflict first worked in a military hospital in the Caucasus then in Stalingrad on a steel-factory reconstruction. Those war years were not devoid of chess activity: he used them to study and develop his chess prowess, and when the Rostov event was restarted in 1944 he qualified for his first USSR Championship.
Bronstein was now firmly established among the elite Soviet masters. Playing for Moscow in a match against Prague in 1946 he won two now extremely famous games with black - against Pachman and Zita – using a remarkable dynamic concept worked out with Boleslavsky that would set the trend of a future half-century of opening theory and practice. The King’s Indian Defence was no longer considered passive and second-rate – it was henceforth the thing to play – and play to win - against the Queen’s Pawn opening! Bronstein twice finishing joint-champion of the USSR: in 1948 (with Alexander Kotov) and in 1949 (with Vasily Smyslov). At Satsjöbaden 1948, the first FIDE Interzonal, Bronstein qualified for and then tied for first place in the subsequent Candidates' Tournament in Budapest in 1950. There was a curious echo of the big match to come with Botvinnik when Boleslavsky, a point clear with two rounds left as Bronstein would be, failed to clinch the challenger’s place. In the play-off match in Moscow Boleslavsky was considered by many to have “allowed” his friend to win. Boleslavsky went back to Moscow for the Botvinnik match however as Bronstein’s second.
THE BOTVINNIK MATCH - 1951
"I have been asked many, many times if I was obliged to lose the 23rd game and if there was a conspiracy against me to stop me from taking Botvinnik's title. A lot of nonsense has been written about this. The only thing that I am prepared to say about all this controversy is that I was subjected to strong psychological pressure from various origins and it was entirely up to me to yield to that pressure or not." His co-author Tom Furstenberg wrote: "Of course David succumbed to that pressure, albeit not voluntarily. However nobody, not even David himself, knows what went on subconsciously in his mind." Back to Bronstein who also had this to say: “I had reasons not to become the World Champion as in those times such a title meant that you were entering an official world of chess bureaucracy with many formal obligations. Such a position is not compatible with my character.”
THE BOTVINNIK MATCH - 1951
Malcolm Pein’s compliation of his excellent columns and notes covering the crucial games of the notorious match can be seen via the TWIC link
«David Bronstein (1924-2006)» After the world championship match Bronstein represented the Soviet Union at the successive Olympiads of 1952, 1954, 1956 and 1958, winning gold board-medals in each appearance for the Soviet team. He was also gold medallist 8 times in USSR Team Championships and was six times individual Moscow Champion. His assault on the World title continued and he played in the Candidates' Tournament in Zurich in 1953, finishing joint-second. There was again speculation of “fixing” - Bronstein claiming that officials had pressured him and certain other Soviet grandmasters in the closing rounds to draw quickly with Smyslov and play hard against the American representative Sammy Reshevsky, the man Moscow certainly did not want challenging their protégé Botvinnik. The title had to stay in Russian hands! Soon after, having only tied for first place with Britain’s Hugh Alexander at the Hastings Congress, Bronstein came in for criticism in Moscow's Literary Gazette. An article accused him and other Soviet players of "complacency and self-conceit", thus robbing the nation of international tournament success.
Bronstein, however, continued to be an elite player for many years, tying for second in the Soviet championships in 1957 and 1964-65, Moscow Champion again in 1957, and winning several big international tournaments. The Bond movie “From Russia with Love” has a game played between a certain Kronsteen(!) and a certain McAdams. It is based on the King’s Gambit brilliant miniature won by Boris Spassky (White) v Bronstein at the 1960 USSR Championship in Leningrad. A decade later when Viktor Korchnoi defected in 1976 Bronstein was one of the few top Soviet grandmasters who refused to sign an official letter condemning him. He was banned from travelling to tournaments in the West and did not compete there again until the ban was lifted as perestroika came in the mid-eighties. He was also barred from the best elite tournaments within the Soviet Union and also from competing anywhere outside the country more than once-a-year. His “pension” book always carried an endorsement meaning a 10% penalty deduction in his allowance.
DAVID IONOVICH BRONSTEIN
Bronstein was also an exceptional writer, having a chess column in Izvestia for many years. His book on the Zurich 1953 tournament (published in 1956 and translated into English as “The Chess Struggle in Practice, 1978”) is considered by many as simply the finest tournament book ever written, if admitting that a significant amount of it had been ghosted by a lesser master. It concentrated on the ideas behind the players' moves and was a unique insight into how grandmasters really think.
DAVID IONOVICH WITH LIUDMILA BELAVENTS
After looking at the video, I’m sure you will want to play through and savour the game in question, so here it is: Reykjavik (Iceland) 1990, Round 10 White: Bronstein, David (RUS) Black : Browne, Walter (USA) Opening : B99 Sicilian – Najdorf 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4
7...Be7 8.Qf3 Qc7 9.O-O-O Nbd7 10.g4 b5 11.Bxf6 Nxf6 12.g5 Nd7
13.f5 (the amazing pawn sacrifice described vividly by Sierawan in the above video). 13...Bxg5+ 14.Kb1 Ne5 15.Qh5 Qd8 16.Rg1 h6 17.fxe6 g6 18.exf7+ Kxf7 19.Qe2
19...Kg7 20.h4 Bxh4 21.Nf5+ Kh7 22.Rxd6 Qf8 23.Qh2 Bxf5 24.Qxe5 Qe7 25.Qxe7+
25...Bxe7 26.Rc6 Rhc8 27.Rb6 Rxc3 28.exf5 Re3 29.Bd3 Bc5
30.Rbxg6 Rae8 31.a4 bxa4 32.f6 Rxd3 33.Rg7+ Kh8 34.Rh1 1-0
Now for some Bronstein quotes: And the ultimate quote must be: b>
************ If you like music, you may choose now a fine background Music:
************
*** FOR PLEASANT SURFING AROUND THIS SITE:
*** FOR DISCOVERING WHO WE ARE:
******** ©-«Chess-Theory.com»-2004-2009 ******** |
![]() |