

|
In April 2006, FIDE announced a reunification match between Vladimir Kramnik (2750) and Veselin Topalov (2813) — the FIDE World Chess Championship 2006. The match took place in Elista... The FIDE World Chess Championship 2006 was a chess match between Classical World Chess Champion Vladimir Kramnik, and FIDE World Chess Champion Veselin Topalov. The match, which was won by Kramnik, determined, for the first time in 13 years, the undisputed World Chess Champion. The match was played between September 23 and October 13, 2006, in Elista, Kalmykia, Russia. (Source: Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia)
We choose, as an illustration of the Topalov's style, a game of the reunification match, where Veselin Topalov wins with Black, in a Semi-Slav Defense, Meran Variation, where he played an interesting theoretical novelty: 15...Qa5.
FIDE World Chess Championship 2006
The classical alternative is here: 6.Qc2; for example: 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 dxc4 8.Bxc4 b6 9.e4 e5 10.g5 Nh5 11.Be2! g6 12.Be3 0-0 13.0-0-0 and White has some good perspectives to attack on the Kingside (Milanovic, Danilo (2480) - Kalezic, Blazo (2448) 1-0 (D45) SCG-chT1 Vrnjacka Banja, 2005).
At the usual 10...Be7, may effectively be substituted 10...c5!? which was introduced by Flohr in the game: Malich, Burkhard - Flohr, Salo ½-½ (D47) Chigorin mem, 1965. But the corresponding position usually leads either to draws or to White wins. This is why this Black move seems today rather forsaken.
DIAG 1
:
DIAG 2
:
An interesting novelty. Had been tested before: 15...a6 16.Rfc1 Qa5 17.Bc6 Bxc6 18.Nxc6 Qxa4 19.Nxd8 Kxd8 20.a3= Cvetkovic, Srdjan - Bajirov, Vladimir ½-½ (D47) Vrnjacka Banka, 1974. We may also notice the short game: 13...a6? 14.Bxd7+ Nxd7 15.Nxd7 Qc7?? (Qxd7 +/-) 16.Nxf8 1-0, Alonso, Rene (2395) - Hilarius, Sander (1892) 1-0 (D47) Seville op 30th, 2005.
On one hand, is not clear: 16...Bxc6 17.Nxc6 Qxa4 18.Nxd8 Kxd8 19.a3 e5 20.Qc4 +/= and on the other one if 17.Bxb7?? then Nxe5! -+
May be envisaged: 20.a3!? 0-0 21.axb4 Qb5 22.Qxa7 Ne4 23.Bc3 Bh4!? = not clear; anyway this endgame, with two black Knights against a Rook and a pawn for White, is not at all obvious and one wonders why Kramnik chose this way.
After: 26...Rc8?! 27.Rxc8 (27.Rxa7?? Bxd6) Nxc8 28.Bxe7 Kxe7 29.Rc1 Ncb6 30.Rc7 a5 31.b3 a4 32.bxa4 Nxa4= the game may be a draw.
DIAG 3
:
It is particularly difficult to judge this position and grandmaster opinions are here frankly divergent.
DIAG 4
:
A good strategy for Black consists now to increase his territory; but, obviously such a plan is rather difficult to realise in the present context!... Anyway, the choice of appropriate pawn moves will be, for each camp, the key of success!
DIAG 5
:
First of all: 32.a4?! is a positional mistake (Judit Polgar); better is simply: 32.Kf1 g5 33.hxg5 hxg5 34.Ke2 (Judit Polgar). It is right that White has now a backward pawn. In the continuation of the erroneous Kramnik's discernment of this endgame 36.b3?! is a weak move, allowing Topalov to increase his initiative. It is preferable to play 36.Rcc7 g3 37.fxg3 Rg8 38.Rc5 Rxg3 39.Rxa5 Rxg2+ 40.Kf1 =/unclear.
DIAG 6
:
It is not easy for Topalov to win this game, indeed. But, in this position, following features explain the significant Black advantage:
41.Kxg3? is a decisive mistake. The optimal line is here: 41.Rb5 (only choice!) N7f6 42.Rcc5 Nc7 43.Rxa5 Rb8 44.Rc3 Ne4 45.Rd3+ Nd5 46.Rb5 Rxb5 47.axb5 Kc5 -/+. This time Topalov owns a strong superiority: White is unable to protect himself simultaneously from an attack on files b and g.
DIAG 7
:
This time, White is mate in 4: 53.Kg1 (53.Ke1 Nd3+ 54.Kd1 Rd2#) Rxg2+ 54.Kf1 (54.Kh1 Nf2#) Rf2+ 55.Kg1 (55.Ke1 Nd3+ 56.Kd1 Rd2#) Nh3+ 56.Kh1 Ng3#
Wikipedia: FIDE World Chess Championship 2006
************
***
*** FOR DISCOVERING WHO WE ARE:
******** ©-«Chess-Theory.com»-2004-2008 ******** |
![]() |